Webquest+Rubric

Grading Rubric for webquest Retrieved from //You Can't Escape Chemistry// techerwebquest: []
 * ** Composition of a Marshmallow Chemistry Project ** ||
 * || ** 4. Distinguished ** || ** 3. Proficient ** || ** 2. Apprentice ** || ** 1. Novice ** ||
 * ** Teamwork-Overview: ** Listened, shared ideas, supported team members, discussed problems, completed own work || Listened carefully to what others said. Shared ideas and resources freely. Talked about problems and found useful solutions. Knew what work needed to be done. Completed own work on time and provided help to other team members. || Listened and participated in all team discussions. Talked about problems and solutions. Completed own tasks on time and helped other team members when they needed assistance. || Listened and participated in some team discussions. Talked more about problems than solutions. Completed assigned tasks, but did not help other team members. || Rarely listened or participated in team discussions. Talked only about problems, not solutions. Did not complete all assigned tasks. Did not help other team members. ||
 * ** Research-Quality: ** || Included facts, conclusions, and opinions from reliable sources. Included opinions of subject-matter experts. || Included facts, conclusions, and opinions from reliable sources. || Included a mixture of facts from reputable sources and opinions from unreliable sources. || Included more opinion than fact. Information was taken from unreliable sources. ||
 * ** Writing-Ideas: ** || All details were unique, interesting, and related to and supported the main idea. || Writing had many interesting details which supported the main idea. || Writing had three or more details that supported the main idea. || Writing had few details. ||
 * ** Writing-Sentence Fluency: ** Length, variety and flow of writing || Most sentences varied in length and structure. Writing had a natural flow that made it easy to read. || Many sentences varied in length and structure. Some sentences did not flow smoothly. || A few sentences varied in length. Most sentences did not flow smoothly. || Sentences were short and did not flow well. Sentence structure did not change. ||
 * ** Media-Graphics: ** Backgrounds, illustrations, photographs, diagrams,and/or animation || Used colorful and consistent backgrounds that enhanced the mood of the project. Graphics helped to clarify, explain, and support content. || Project used consistent background throughout. Used graphics to support project ideas and content. || Project used many different conflicting backgrounds. Graphics were used, but did not always support the content. || Project did not use backgrounds. Graphics were inappropriate and detracted from project. ||
 * ** Design-Layout and Organization: ** Organized and easy to read || Content was well organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were neatly organized and made the project easy to read. || Project was organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were placed to make the project easy to read. || Most of the project was organized. The placement of text and graphics sometimes made the project hard to read. || Project was hard to read. There is no clear structure. Text and graphics were randomly placed. ||
 * ** Writing-Sentence Fluency: ** Length, variety and flow of writing || Most sentences varied in length and structure. Writing had a natural flow that made it easy to read. || Many sentences varied in length and structure. Some sentences did not flow smoothly. || A few sentences varied in length. Most sentences did not flow smoothly. || Sentences were short and did not flow well. Sentence structure did not change. ||
 * ** Media-Graphics: ** Backgrounds, illustrations, photographs, diagrams,and/or animation || Used colorful and consistent backgrounds that enhanced the mood of the project. Graphics helped to clarify, explain, and support content. || Project used consistent background throughout. Used graphics to support project ideas and content. || Project used many different conflicting backgrounds. Graphics were used, but did not always support the content. || Project did not use backgrounds. Graphics were inappropriate and detracted from project. ||
 * ** Design-Layout and Organization: ** Organized and easy to read || Content was well organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were neatly organized and made the project easy to read. || Project was organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were placed to make the project easy to read. || Most of the project was organized. The placement of text and graphics sometimes made the project hard to read. || Project was hard to read. There is no clear structure. Text and graphics were randomly placed. ||
 * ** Media-Graphics: ** Backgrounds, illustrations, photographs, diagrams,and/or animation || Used colorful and consistent backgrounds that enhanced the mood of the project. Graphics helped to clarify, explain, and support content. || Project used consistent background throughout. Used graphics to support project ideas and content. || Project used many different conflicting backgrounds. Graphics were used, but did not always support the content. || Project did not use backgrounds. Graphics were inappropriate and detracted from project. ||
 * ** Design-Layout and Organization: ** Organized and easy to read || Content was well organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were neatly organized and made the project easy to read. || Project was organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were placed to make the project easy to read. || Most of the project was organized. The placement of text and graphics sometimes made the project hard to read. || Project was hard to read. There is no clear structure. Text and graphics were randomly placed. ||
 * ** Design-Layout and Organization: ** Organized and easy to read || Content was well organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were neatly organized and made the project easy to read. || Project was organized with headings and subheadings. Text and graphics were placed to make the project easy to read. || Most of the project was organized. The placement of text and graphics sometimes made the project hard to read. || Project was hard to read. There is no clear structure. Text and graphics were randomly placed. ||